I think this hand is a good example of bidding constructively, trying to decide how high to bid.

South’s first double shows a good opening bid. His 3♦ shows a hand simply too good to bid 2♦. This hand is close to a minimum for this sequence. Your partner has come to life with a cue bid. What does he have?

First he has diamond support. Otherwise he would either pass, bid a new suit or bid 3NT. What about values? He probably has one sure trick. Does three spades mean anything? True he could have simply bid 4♦, but he probably wanted to keep 3NT open in case you have a stopper. What should you bid? 4♦. This will be plenty high enough. Partner was catering to you having one of the following hands:

♠Ax ♥Kx ♦KQJxxx ♣AKx or

♠x ♥A10 ♦KQ9872 ♣AKQ7

Partner actually held ♠xx ♥J9xx ♦Axx ♣109xx and passed 4♦, which made on the nose.

Lessons to Learn

1. Remember to make decisions in the context of the auction. Here you are a minimum for your double followed by three diamond approach, which is why four diamonds is right.

2. Another way to look at it is that North has a maximum, considering his passes and two bidding opponents. His 3 spades, therefore, is a very good bid recognizing this point.

Questions or comments may be sent to me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.